Panel, dependencies, financial health, quality, location: the assistant crosses your data to rate each supplier on a multi-axis grid, propose mitigation plans — and produce the structured, traceable file IATF 16949 expects.
Financial, capacity and bottlenecks, single source, geographic and logistics, quality, compliance: each supplier rated axis by axis — with justification, not a decreed traffic light.
Danger is never on a single axis: single source × fragile health × capacity bottleneck — that combination is what the assistant hunts.
Dated, with owners: second-source qualification, safety stock, audit, development plan — a plan that lives.
Structured, traceable documentation: what the IATF 16949 auditor asks for under §8.4 — and what most panels don't have.
The documented supplier risk assessment requirement: the file built in days, not weeks.
The panel risk map presented to management, data-backed, refreshed at every review.
Before committing to a programme: which suppliers will hold, which are the weak link — and what to do.
Contractual requirements, the D1-D8 grid, recurrences — the IATF culture of proof, applied to the panel and its risks.
Every trainee leaves with their reflexes and 7 days of access to the assistant, on their real files. Confidentiality is chosen by level — L1 · L2 · L3 explained here.
Bring your panel and your data, even incomplete — the assistant also tells you what to collect. No commitment — and you leave with a usable analysis.