It is every buyer's legitimate objection to AI. Yxalo's answer: three deployment levels, chosen according to the sensitivity of your data. The detailed architecture is documented and handed to your CISO or DPO.
Your data is processed solely within the technical and contractual perimeter agreed with you. It is never used to train the models. Subprocessors, locations, retention periods and reversibility conditions are documented before deployment.
Enterprise environment, with no training on your data.
Processing and storage in the European Union.
French qualified infrastructure for the most sensitive files.
Deployment is possible on a SecNumCloud-qualified cloud infrastructure, depending on the project's scope and requirements. The right reflex: start at the level that matches your actual data, not at the maximum on principle.
The detailed architecture (subprocessors, locations, retention, reversibility) is documented and handed to your CISO or DPO as part of a deployment.
Consumer versions may use conversations to improve their models, and your prices circulate there with no framework or traceability. Moving to a professional offering changes the contract: zero training, controlled perimeter — for a cost far below the risk.
The first demonstration runs on fictional, public or previously anonymised data. Real files are processed only after contractual scoping and the choice of the appropriate confidentiality level.
Each user has their own account and conversations. Assistants are enabled company by company and user by user. You keep control of the rights — and your content is not our data.
No. The level is chosen per perimeter according to the sensitivity of your data. The tool stays the same for your teams.
CISO, DPO, management: bring your requirements — the detailed architecture that answers them is documented and handed to you as part of a deployment.
